People participate in a protest outside the US Supreme Court on May 15, 2025, over President Trump’s move to end birthright citizenship.
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday on whether all children born in the United States can continue to automatically receive citizenship.
The decision, which was not expected for months, could reshape a long-standing, constitutionally established practice that the Trump administration has challenged.
Public opinion on this issue is complex. Americans favor granting citizenship to children born to parents who were born in the US – or to those who immigrated to the US legally. But they are much less divided on the issue of, or in support of, automatic citizenship for children born to immigrant parents. illegally.
Is birthright citizenship a general policy?
only about three dozen countries Around the world, mostly in the Western Hemisphere, automatic birthright citizenship is granted.
is the legal term for the practice just soliLatin for “right to the soil.” It has its roots in colonialism, especially in South America and Africa, when Western European countries more people were needed for labor and to outnumber the original population At those places. many african countries abandoned Practice after independence.

Other countries have also ended this practice in recent decades. After this Ireland did this in 2005 Nearly 80% of voters rejected it. The United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand, India and Pakistan have all abolished it as well.
Many countries offer citizenship in exchange for jus sanguinisOr “right of blood.” In other words, through family lineage. However, this month, Italy also further restricted Who is worthy.
Can’t watch the video above? check it out here.
What does the Constitution say?
In the United States, birthright citizenship became part of the Constitution in 1868 as an effort to protect recently freed slaves.
It was enacted with the passage of the 14th Amendment. Section 1 of the amendment says: :
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
But President Trump has taken aim at birthright citizenship, passing a executive Order Banned it on the first day of his second term.
In taking aim at immigrants who cross the border illegally, the Trump administration argues that section of the Constitution is outdated and misused.
Where do the people stand?
Public opinion is based on birthright citizenship and may depend on how pollsters ask the question.
When surveys ask about birthright citizenship GeneralPeople overwhelmingly say they are supportive. But that support begins to wane when respondents are asked about parents’ legal status — with significant divisions by party, race, age and how they get their information.

A Public Religion Research Institute Survey from December found that two-thirds of people are in favor of granting citizenship “regardless of the citizenship status of their parents”. A large sample survey by Citizen Health and Institutions Project, or CHIP50A survey conducted in collaboration with several universities found 59% were in favor of retaining it.
But both showed greater support than other surveys, and both mentioned in their questions that this right is found in the US Constitution.
Other surveys have found less support. For example:
- Last year, the opposition got a slight majority (53%) in the NPR/Ipsos survey. ending in In favor of the practice 28%. (It asked whether people support or oppose ending this practice.)
- Pew Research Center revealed that more than 9 in 10 support birthright citizenship for people born to parents who immigrated to the US legally, but were split – by a 50%-49% margin – on granting it to people born to parents who are living in the country illegally. (Pew asked whether certain groups should be considered U.S. citizens or not.)
- A YouGov poll 51% were in favor and 39% were against. But it dropped significantly for those who are not in the country legally. Only 31% said they were in favor of granting citizenship to children of people who have “undocumented” documents, the survey said, and only 25% to tourists visiting the US. (YouGov didn’t even mention in its questions that birthright citizenship is in the Constitution.)
Divides by party, race and more
Multiple surveys consistently show that a majority of Democrats, Latinos, Black Americans, and those who are young are in favor of birthright citizenship, while a majority of Republicans, especially white Republicans, are against it.
For example, Pew found that three-quarters of Democrats were in support of granting citizenship to children of people who immigrated illegally, but only one-quarter of Republicans supported it.
However, there is division among Republicans. Only 18% of white Republicans are in favor of it, but 55% of Republican Hispanics are in favor of it.

By race, regardless of political party, Pew found that three-quarters of Latinos and 61% of Black Americans were in favor of birthright citizenship for those whose parents were illegal immigrants, but only 48% of Asian Americans and 42% of whites.
Similarly, CHIP50 found that 8 in 10 Democrats support birthright citizenship “regardless of their parents’ immigration status,” but only 39% of Republicans are in favor. (It found a much higher percentage of Asian Americans – 63% – in favor. YouGov found only 53% of Democrats favored it when the parents are “undocumented immigrants”, and an even lower 13% of Republicans supported it.)

According to Pew, if parents “immigrated illegally”, people under the age of 50 favor birthright citizenship by a margin of 58%–41%. But nearly 6 in 10 among people 50 or older were against it.
There was also a split based on how long the defendant had been in the United States. In Pew’s poll, two-thirds of second-generation Americans were in favor. But 55% of people in the third generation or above were against it.
PRRI also found major differences in the way information is consumed. In that survey, 80% or more of those who trusted newspapers or mainstream TV news most were in support of birthright citizenship, “regardless of their parents’ citizenship status.”
But only 41% of those who trust Fox News support birthright citizenship, and an even lower number (29%) among those who prefer outlets considered even more right-wing.
